Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Jul 1986

Bionator Eeatment in Class II, Division 1

and
Page Range: 255 – 262
DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1986)056<0255:BEICID>2.0.CO;2
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

Twenty cases treated with a Bionator followed by fixed appliance therapy are compared to an untreated sample and a group treated with fixed appliances only. The most notable differences in Bionator effects are increased vertical dimension and mandibular plane angle. The first appliance used, whether Bionator or fixed, produced similar changes.

Copyright: Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists

Contributor Notes

Dr. Bolmgren is in the private practice of orthodontics in Minneapolis, Minnesota. He holds a D.D.S. degree from the University of Minnesota and an M.S. in Orthodontics from the Washington University School of Dental Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri

Dr. Moshiri is in the private practice of Orthodontics in Florissant, Missouri. He is former Chairman of the Department of Orthodontics at Washington University in St. Louis. He is a dental graduate (D.M.D.) of the National University of Iran, and holds an M.S. degree in orthodontics from Northwestern University

  • Download PDF