Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Sept 1993

Direct bond brackets: cotton roll versus rubber dam isolation

DDS,
MSD, and
DDS
Page Range: 231 – 234
DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1993)063<0231:DBBCRV>2.0.CO;2
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

Forty-four brackets were bonded “in vivo” using cotton roll and rubber dam isolation. Maxillary and mandibular premolars, to be extracted for orthodontic reasons, were used in this study. After bonding, the teeth were retained in the mouth for at least 30 days. They were extracted using surgical elevators. After extraction, the teeth were secured in plastic rings using gypsum and kept in water for 7 days until debonding. A Universal Instron Machine was used to produce a shear force at a speed of 0.1 cm/min until each bracket was removed. No statistically significant differences for debonding strength were observed between the two types of isolation, nor between the buccal and palatal surfaces of the teeth. One hundred percent of the failures occurred at the bracket/composite interface.

Copyright: Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists

Contributor Notes

M. Heringer is an Orthodontist at the State University of Rio de Janerio

M.A. Almeida is a Research Fellow at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

J.A. Miguel is an Orthodontist at the State University of Rio de Janerio

  • Download PDF