Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Oct 1997

A retrospective comparison of frontal facial dimensions in alveolar-bone-grafted and nongrafted unilateral cleft lip and palate patients

BDS, MA, MS,
BSc,
DMS, MSc,
DDS, PhD, and
DDS, MS, PhD, FDSRCS(E)
Page Range: 389 – 394
DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1997)067<0389:ARCOFF>2.3.CO;2
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

This retrospective study was undertaken to describe and compare frontal craniofacial dimensions in alveolar-bone-grafted and nongrafted complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (CUCLP) patients and in noncleft subjects with normal occlusions and good facial balance. Clinical data were obtained from the files of the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they had posteroanterior cephalograms (PA) taken at adulthood and no congenital anomalies other than CUCLP. A total of 86 adult Caucasian CULCP patients were studied, including 58 who had not received grafts, 28 who had received secondary alveolar bone grafts, and, for comparison, 60 noncleft Caucasian adults. The PA cephalometric radiographs were traced, digitized, and measured. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test for among-groups differences in the means of the ratios, proportions, and angular measures. Tukey-Kramer HSD procedure was used to conduct post-hoc pairwise comparisons following significant (p ≤ 0.05) F-ratios from ANOVA. Sexual dimorphism was a common finding, with males demonstrating greater facial width. Despite primary surgical repairs, the anterior nasal spine in the nongrafted CUCLP patients was deviated to the noncleft side, and the alar base was depressed on the cleft side. The maxillary incisors close to the cleft site were irregularly inclined, and this irregularity was more severe in the nongrafted CUCLP patients. The long-term effects of secondary alveolar bone grafting on transverse craniofacial growth appears to be minimal and limited to the immediate area of the cleft.

Copyright: Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists
Accepted: 01 Jul 1996
  • Download PDF