Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Nov 2005

Uvulo-Glosso-Pharyngeal Dimensions in Different Anteroposterior Skeletal Patterns

and
Page Range: 1012 – 1018
DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[1012:UDIDAS]2.0.CO;2
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the uvulo-glosso-pharyngeal dimensions in subjects with different anteroposterior jaw relationship. Cephalometric radiograph of 90 subjects (45 females and 45 males, aged 14–17 years) were divided into three groups according to the ANB angle, ie, group 1, skeletal Class I (ANB angle 1–5); group 2, skeletal Class II (ANB angle >5); and group 3, skeletal Class III (ANB angle <1). In addition, each group was divided into two subgroups according to sex. Statistical analysis was undertaken using analysis of variance and least significant difference test. Pearson's Correlation test was also performed. Sex differences were found in Class I and III subjects. No sex differences were detected in Class II subjects. On average, tongue length was significantly shorter in Class III subjects (P < .05), tongue height was reduced in Class II female subjects, the soft palate was thicker in Class III females and the vertical airway length (VAL) was reduced in Class II male subjects (P < .01). In Class II subjects, the hyoid bone was closer to the mandible vertically and to C3 horizontally compared with Class I (P < .01) and Class III (P < .001) male subjects. Anteroposterior skeletal pattern showed a weak, but significant correlation with inferior pharyngeal airway space (R = −0.24, P = .024), vertical position of hyoid bone in relation to mandibular plane (R = −0.26, P = .014), and anteroposterior position of hyoid bone in relation to C3 (R = −0.561, P = .000). In conclusion, uvulo-glosso-pharyngeal dimensions are affected by anteroposterior skeletal pattern.

INTRODUCTION

Significant relationships between the pharyngeal structures and both dentofacial and craniofacial structures have been reported.1–7 Skeletal features such as retrusion of the maxilla and mandible and vertical maxillary excess in hyperdivergent patients may lead to narrower anteroposterior dimensions of the airway.8 On the other hand, the oropharyngeal airway has been claimed to affect the growth of craniofacial structures. To breathe through the mouth, one must maintain an oral airway, and, to accomplish this, the mandible and the tongue are displaced downward and backward and the head is tipped back. These postural changes suggest the possible effect on the relationship of teeth as well as the direction of jaw growth, which may become more downward and backward.9

Recently, interest has been focused on uvulo-glosso-pharyngeal dimensions because of a potential relationship between size and structure of upper airway and sleep-induced breathing disturbances.1011 It has been shown that Obstructive Sleep Apnea patients have aberrated skeletal and soft tissue patterns that reduce airway space.1012 The face and anterior cranial base tend to be retruded,1314 the cranial base angle reduced,15 the mandible short or retrognathic (or both),1617 and the lower face height and maxillomandibular planes angle increased.1314 Moreover, the hyoid bone is usually located inferior in relation to the mandibular plane, the tongue and soft palate are enlarged,10151819 and the posterior airway space is reduced.1720

The hyoid bone and its musculature occupy an important role in the maintenance of the pharyngeal airway.21 Several studies have shown that changes in hyoid bone position tend to be related to changes in mandibular position.22–29 Battagel et al29 reported a more posterior position of the hyoid bone in Class II subjects with a narrower upper airways and Adamidis and Spyropoulos30 showed that hyoid bone in Class III subjects lay more anteriorly. The effect of the change in anteroposterior position of the mandible on hyoid bone position and the pharyngeal airway space is well documented.529–32 Surgical mandibular advancement resulted in anterior positioning of the hyoid bone and widening of the minimal pharyngeal airway space,31 whereas surgical mandibular setback was associated with reduction of the saggital dimensions of the oropharyngeal airway space.32 Moreover, Battagel et al29 suggested that mandibular advancement with protrusion splint was associated with a proportionate increase in oropharyngeal dimensions.

On the basis of this close relationship between uvulo-glosso-pharyngeal structures and the facial skeleton, a difference in size and position of soft and hard tissue structures of upper airway in different anteroposterior skeletal patterns was hypothesized. This study, using lateral cephalograms, was carried out to determine whether the uvulo-glosso-pharyngeal dimensions of subjects with normal nasal breathing could be affected by the different anteroposterior jaw relationships.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Lateral cephalometric radiographs were selected from the files of orthodontic patients at the orthodontic department, Jordan University of Science and Technology Dental Teaching Centre. Records for 1520 orthodontic patients were screened and 90 subjects (45 females and 45 males, ages 14–17 years) were included with the following criteria: no history of orthodontic treatment; breathing comfortably through the nose; normal vertical occlusal relationship (Max/Man planes angle 25.5° ± 5).

Cephalometric radiographs were taken with a Siemens Orthophos-5 machine (Siemens AG, Munich, Federal Republic of Germany) using a standardized technique and a fixed anode-midsaggital plane distance. The subjects were asked not to swallow, not to move their heads and tongues, and to contact their teeth lightly while the radiographs were being exposed. The magnification of the radiographic machine, which was not corrected, was 11.3.

Lateral skull radiographs were traced on acetate paper and 10 hard and soft tissue cephalometric points were registered yielding 12 linear measurements (Figure 1). The measurements were performed manually using a ruler to the nearest 0.1 mm.

FIGURE 1. Cephalometric points, lines, and linear variables used in the cephalometric analysis. TT, tongue tip; Eb, base of epiglottis; P, tip of soft palate; PNS, posterior nasal spine; Me, menton; Go, gonion; B, point B; RGN, retrognathion; H, hyoidale; C3: Anteroinferior limit of third cervical vertebra. Mandibular plane: Go-Me, Go-B line. (1) TGL, tongue length (Eb-TT); (2) TGH, tongue height (maximum height of tongue along perpendicular line of Eb-TT line to tongue dorsum); (3) PNSP, soft palate length (PNS-P); (4) MPT, soft palate thickness (maximum thickness of soft palate measured on line perpendicular to PNS-P line); (5) SPAS, superior posterior airway space (width of airway behind soft palate along parallel line to Go-B line); (6) MAS, middle airway space (width of airway along parallel line to Go-B line through P); (7) IAS, inferior airway space (width of airway space along Go-B line); (8) VAL, vertical airway length (distance between PNS and Eb); (9) MPH, perpendicular distance from hyoid bone to mandibular plane; (10) HH1, perpendicular distance from hyoid bone to the line connecting C3 and RGN; (11) HRGN, distance between hyoid bone and RGN; (12) C3H, distance between hyoid bone and C3FIGURE 1. Cephalometric points, lines, and linear variables used in the cephalometric analysis. TT, tongue tip; Eb, base of epiglottis; P, tip of soft palate; PNS, posterior nasal spine; Me, menton; Go, gonion; B, point B; RGN, retrognathion; H, hyoidale; C3: Anteroinferior limit of third cervical vertebra. Mandibular plane: Go-Me, Go-B line. (1) TGL, tongue length (Eb-TT); (2) TGH, tongue height (maximum height of tongue along perpendicular line of Eb-TT line to tongue dorsum); (3) PNSP, soft palate length (PNS-P); (4) MPT, soft palate thickness (maximum thickness of soft palate measured on line perpendicular to PNS-P line); (5) SPAS, superior posterior airway space (width of airway behind soft palate along parallel line to Go-B line); (6) MAS, middle airway space (width of airway along parallel line to Go-B line through P); (7) IAS, inferior airway space (width of airway space along Go-B line); (8) VAL, vertical airway length (distance between PNS and Eb); (9) MPH, perpendicular distance from hyoid bone to mandibular plane; (10) HH1, perpendicular distance from hyoid bone to the line connecting C3 and RGN; (11) HRGN, distance between hyoid bone and RGN; (12) C3H, distance between hyoid bone and C3FIGURE 1. Cephalometric points, lines, and linear variables used in the cephalometric analysis. TT, tongue tip; Eb, base of epiglottis; P, tip of soft palate; PNS, posterior nasal spine; Me, menton; Go, gonion; B, point B; RGN, retrognathion; H, hyoidale; C3: Anteroinferior limit of third cervical vertebra. Mandibular plane: Go-Me, Go-B line. (1) TGL, tongue length (Eb-TT); (2) TGH, tongue height (maximum height of tongue along perpendicular line of Eb-TT line to tongue dorsum); (3) PNSP, soft palate length (PNS-P); (4) MPT, soft palate thickness (maximum thickness of soft palate measured on line perpendicular to PNS-P line); (5) SPAS, superior posterior airway space (width of airway behind soft palate along parallel line to Go-B line); (6) MAS, middle airway space (width of airway along parallel line to Go-B line through P); (7) IAS, inferior airway space (width of airway space along Go-B line); (8) VAL, vertical airway length (distance between PNS and Eb); (9) MPH, perpendicular distance from hyoid bone to mandibular plane; (10) HH1, perpendicular distance from hyoid bone to the line connecting C3 and RGN; (11) HRGN, distance between hyoid bone and RGN; (12) C3H, distance between hyoid bone and C3
FIGURE 1. Cephalometric points, lines, and linear variables used in the cephalometric analysis. TT, tongue tip; Eb, base of epiglottis; P, tip of soft palate; PNS, posterior nasal spine; Me, menton; Go, gonion; B, point B; RGN, retrognathion; H, hyoidale; C3: Anteroinferior limit of third cervical vertebra. Mandibular plane: Go-Me, Go-B line. (1) TGL, tongue length (Eb-TT); (2) TGH, tongue height (maximum height of tongue along perpendicular line of Eb-TT line to tongue dorsum); (3) PNSP, soft palate length (PNS-P); (4) MPT, soft palate thickness (maximum thickness of soft palate measured on line perpendicular to PNS-P line); (5) SPAS, superior posterior airway space (width of airway behind soft palate along parallel line to Go-B line); (6) MAS, middle airway space (width of airway along parallel line to Go-B line through P); (7) IAS, inferior airway space (width of airway space along Go-B line); (8) VAL, vertical airway length (distance between PNS and Eb); (9) MPH, perpendicular distance from hyoid bone to mandibular plane; (10) HH1, perpendicular distance from hyoid bone to the line connecting C3 and RGN; (11) HRGN, distance between hyoid bone and RGN; (12) C3H, distance between hyoid bone and C3

Citation: The Angle Orthodontist 75, 6; 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[1012:UDIDAS]2.0.CO;2

The films were divided into three groups according to the ANB angle:

  • group 1, skeletal Class I (ANB angle 1–5)

  • group 2, skeletal Class II (ANB angle >5)

  • group 3, skeletal Class III (ANB angle <1).

In addition, each group was divided into two subgroups according to sex.

Method error

Twenty randomly selected films were retraced and measured and method errors calculated as recommended by Dahlberg33 and Houston.34 The Dahlberg error varied from 0.21 mm for IAS to 0.45 mm for PNS-Eb. Houston's coefficient of reliability was above 0.90 for all variables.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics including the mean and standard deviation for each group were computed using SPSS PC+ (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill). The differences between males and females were tested using Student's t-test. Analysis of variance was used to determine whether significant differences existed between the groups. Least significant difference multiple comparison test was applied to identify which of the groups were different. Pearson's correlation coefficient test was used to detect any relationship between ANB angle and other variables.

RESULTS

The results of the statistical analysis are shown in Tables 1 through 3. In Class I, sex differences were detected in the vertical position of the hyoid bone in relation to the mandibular plane and in relation to a line connecting retrognathion to C3 (P < .05 and P < .001, respectively), and in the anterior-posterior position of hyoid bone relative to retrognathion (P < .05). In Class III subjects, sex differences were found in the vertical airway length (VAL) (P < .01), the vertical position of hyoid bone in relation to mandibular plane and in relation to a line connecting retrognathion to C3 (P < .01 and P < .001, respectively), and the anterior-posterior position of hyoid bone relative to retrognathion (P < .05). No sex differences were found in Class II subjects.

TABLE 1. Means, Standard Deviations and P Values for Sex Differences in Each of the Three Skeletal Groupsa

          TABLE 1. 

Females

In females, the tongue was significantly thicker in Class III subjects compared with Class II subjects (P < .05). Such a difference was not detected between Class I and Class II or between Class I and Class III. The soft palate was thinner in Class I subjects compared with Class II and Class III. A significant level has been only reached between Class I and Class III (P < .05). In Class II subjects, hyoid bone was closer to C3. A significant difference was evident between Class II and Class III (P < .01).

Males

On average, VAL was significantly reduced in Class II males compared with Class I (P < .01) and Class III (P < .01) male subjects.

Vertical position of hyoid bone in relation to mandibular plane differed significantly between the three groups. In Class II subjects, the vertical position of hyoid bone was closer to the mandibular plane and to a line connecting retrognathion and C3 compared with both Class I (P < .01 and P < .01, respectively) and Class III subjects (P < .001 and P < .01, respectively). In the anteroposterior dimension, the hyoid bone was closer to C3 in Class II subjects compared with Class I (P < .01) and Class III (P < .001). No statistically significant differences were found in the position of the hyoid bone to C3 in Class I and III.

Total group

Tongue length was significantly shorter in Class III compared with Class I subjects. Class I and Class II subjects did not differ in tongue length. VAL was significantly reduced in Class II subjects compared with Class III (P < .05) subjects. No difference was detected between Class I and Class II subjects nor Class I and Class III subjects. The vertical position of the hyoid bone in relation to mandibular plane differed significantly between Class II and Class III subjects only (P < .05). The anteroposterior position of hyoid bone in relation to C3 differed significantly between the three groups. The hyoid bone was more anteriorly positioned in Class III subjects compared with Class I (P < .05) and Class II (P < .001) subjects. In Class II subjects, it was closer to C3 compared with the Class I subjects (P < .01).

Skeletal configuration (ANB) showed a weak but significant correlation with the inferior pharyngeal airway space (R = −0.24, P = .024), vertical position of hyoid bone in relation to mandibular plane (R = −0.26, P = .014) and anteroposterior position of hyoid bone in relation to C3 (R = −0.056, P = .000).

DISCUSSION

The nasopharyngeal dimensions continue to grow rapidly until 13 years of age35 and then slows until adulthood.3637 In this study, the age range was 14–17 years to ensure that the oropharyngeal structures had reached adult size.

The anteroposterior skeletal relationship was determined using Jordanian norms38 of the ANB angle (ANB = 3 ± 2°). ANB angle is considered the most commonly used cephalometric measurement for evaluation of anteroposterior jaw relationship.3940 The validity of this measurement has been investigated by several researchers. Jacobson41 showed that ANB angle does not provide adequate assessment of jaw relationship because rotational growth of the jaws and the anteroposterior position of nasion influence the ANB angle. Furthermore, Hussels and Nanda42 reported that the vertical lengths from nasion to point B and from point A to point B are usually affected. On the other hand, Oktay39 and Ishikawa et al43 reported that ANB angle is one of the most reliable and accurate measurements of the anteroposterior jaw relationship.

Mouth breathing results in a number of postural changes, such as downward and forward tongue position and head extension.24242644 Because the mode of breathing affects mandibular position, inclination of the mandibular plane, and head posture, only subjects with a normal breathing pattern were included in this study. Because head posture has been suggested to influence the dimensions of the oropharyngeal airway,45–47 cephalometric radiographs of the subjects were recorded with the head in a natural position.4748

Long face subjects have backward growth direction expressed in an increase in face height and gonial angle. It has been found that adenoid obstruction is most common among long face subjects.4950 Opdebeeck et al24 reported smaller nasopharyngeal cavities in long face subjects compared with short face ones. In our study, only subjects with normal vertical skeletal relationship were included to eliminate any effect on nasopharyngeal airway caused by changes in the vertical plane.

Sex differences were not detected in tongue and soft palate dimensions. Pharyngeal dimensions were not affected by sex except in Class III subjects where VAL was longer in males. These findings are in agreement with those reported in the literature,46736 which suggest that sex differences in the pharyngeal dimensions are not present. However, vertical and anteroposterior position of the hyoid bone showed sex differences in Class I and III subjects only, which may reflect a sex difference in neck thickness.

Hyoid bone position is of great clinical interest because it plays an important role in maintaining the upper airway dimensions.51 In this study, the hyoid bone position was different in the different skeletal patterns. In Class II subjects, hyoid bone was located in an upward and backward position, whereas it was located in downward and forward position in Class III subjects. These findings were in agreement with those reported by others.52–54 Yamaoka et al52 found that tongue root was situated more posterior in Angle's Class II compared with Angle's Class III females.

Our study revealed that anteroposterior pharyngeal airway dimensions were not affected by the changes of the ANB angle. This was in agreement with earlier studies suggesting that the anteroposterior dimension of the upper airway is usually maintained by adaptation of both tongue and hyoid bone.2325 Because the hyoid bone is located more posterior in Class II skeletal pattern, the genioglossus, the main protruder of the tongue, generates upper airway dilating forces to maintain upper airway patency.54

However, Kerr5 reported that Class II subjects had a larger nasopharyngeal area than Class I subjects with malocclusion. On the other hand, the VAL was affected by the change in the anteroposterior jaw relationship and Class II subjects had short VAL compared with Class III subjects. Pae et al55 reported that as hyoid bone position moves inferiorly, the pharyngeal length become longer because the hyoid bone and epiglottis are in a close anatomical relationship. The hyoid bone position detected in Class II and Class III in this study explains the difference in upper airway length in Class II and Class III subjects.

Our findings regarding the relationship between uvulo-glosso-pharyngeal structures and anteroposterior skeletal pattern are inconsistent with those that reported no relationship between pharyngeal structures and the ANB angle.475657 However, the variables used to measure pharyngeal airway in the previous studies differed from those used in this investigation, which makes the comparison more difficult.

Although significant correlation was found in this study between anteroposterior skeletal relationship and airway dimensions, it was a low correlation, which was in agreement with that reported by Kerr.5 The position of the hyoid bone and width of inferior pharyngeal space were correlated with the change in ANB angle. As the ANB increases, the inferior pharyngeal space is reduced and the hyoid bone moves upward and backward.

CONCLUSIONS

  • Sex differences in the pharyngeal dimensions were found in Class I and Class III skeletal patterns.

  • The position of hyoid bone and the width of inferior pharyngeal space had a significant but weak correlation with the change in ANB angle.

TABLE 1. Extended

          TABLE 1. 
TABLE 2. The F Values for Comparisons of the Three Skeletal Patterns in Females, Males, and Total Group Using ANOVAa

          TABLE 2. 
TABLE 3. Mean Differences (in mm) Between Class I, Class II and Class III in Females, Males and Total Groups and Level of Significance Using LSD Testa

          TABLE 3. 

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Dunn, G. F.
    ,
    L. J.Green
    , and
    J. J.Cunat
    . Relationships between variation of mandibular morphology and variation of nasopharyngeal airway size in monozygotic twins.Angle Orthod1973. 43:129135.
  • 2
    McNamara Jr., J. A.
    Influence of respiratory pattern on craniofacial growth. Angle Orthod 1981. 51:269300.
  • 3
    Sosa, F. A.
    ,
    T. M.Graber
    , and
    T. P.Muller
    . Postpharyngeal lymphoid tissue in Angle Class I and Class II malocclusions.Am J Orthod1982. 81:299309.
  • 4
    Solow, B.
    ,
    S.Siersbæk-Nielsen
    , and
    E.Greve
    . Airway adequacy, head posture, and craniofacial morphology.Am J Orthod1984. 86:214223.
  • 5
    Kerr, W. J. S.
    The nasopharynx, face height and overbite. Angle Orthod 1985. 55:3136.
  • 6
    Linder-Aronson, S.
    and
    B. C.Leighton
    . A longitudinal study of the development of the posterior nasopharyngeal wall between 3 and 16 years of age.Eur J Orthod1983. 5:4758.
  • 7
    Ceylan, I.
    and
    H.Oktay
    . A study on the pharyngeal size in different skeletal patterns.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1995. 108:6975.
  • 8
    Joseph, A. A.
    ,
    J.Elbaum
    ,
    G. J.Cisneros
    , and
    S. B.Eisig
    . A cephalometric comparative study of the soft tissue airway dimensions in persons with hyperdivergent and normodivergent facial patterns.J Oral Maxillofac Surg1998. 56:135139.
  • 9
    Oulis, C. J.
    ,
    G. P.Vadiakas
    ,
    J.Ekonomides
    , and
    J.Dratsa
    . The effect of hypertrophic adenoids and tonsils on the development of posterior crossbite and oral habits.J Clin Pediatr Dent1994. 18:197201.
  • 10
    Lyberg, T.
    ,
    O.Krogstad
    , and
    G.Djupesland
    . Cephalometric analysis in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.J Laryngol Otol1989. 103:293297.
  • 11
    Bacon, W. H.
    ,
    J. C.Turlot
    ,
    J.Krieger
    , and
    J. L.Stierlie
    . Craniofacial evaluation of pharyngeal obstructive factors in patients with sleep apnea syndrome.Angle Orthod1990. 60:115122.
  • 12
    Riley, R.
    ,
    C.Guilleminault
    ,
    J.Herran
    , and
    N.Powell
    . Cephalometric analysis and flow-volume loops in obstructive sleep apnea patients.Sleep1983. 6:303311.
  • 13
    Lowe, A. A.
    ,
    J. D.Santamaria
    ,
    J. A.Fleetham
    , and
    C.Price
    . Facial morphology and obstructive sleep apnea.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1986. 90:484491.
  • 14
    Lowe, A. A.
    ,
    T.Ono
    ,
    K. A.Ferguson
    ,
    E. K.Pae
    ,
    C. F.Ryan
    , and
    J. A.Fleetham
    . Cephalometric comparisons of cranio-facial and upper airway structure by skeletal subtype and gender in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1996. 110:653664.
  • 15
    Jamieson, A.
    ,
    C.Guilleminault
    ,
    M.Partinen
    , and
    M. A.Quera-Salva
    . Obstructive sleep apneic patients have cranio-mandibular abnormalities.Sleep1986. 9:469477.
  • 16
    Lowe, A. A.
    ,
    K.Takada
    ,
    B. E.Yamagata
    , and
    M.Sakuda
    . Dentoskeletal and soft tissue correlates: a cephalometric analysis of rest position.Am J Orthod1985. 88:333341.
  • 17
    Battagel, J. M.
    and
    P. R.L'Estrange
    . The cephalometric morphology of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA).Eur J Orthod1996. 18:557569.
  • 18
    de-Berry-Borowiecki, B.
    ,
    A.Kukwa
    ,
    R. H. I.Blanks
    , and
    C. A.Irvine
    . Cephalometric analysis for diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.Laryngoscope1988. 98:226234.
  • 19
    Tangugsorn, V.
    ,
    O.Skatvedt
    ,
    O.Krogstad
    , and
    T.Lyberg
    . Obstructive sleep apnea: a cephalometric study. Part I: cervico-craniofacial morphology.Eur J Orthod1995. 17:4556.
  • 20
    Solow, B.
    ,
    S.Skov
    ,
    J.Ovesen
    ,
    P. W.Norup
    , and
    G.Wildschiødtz
    . Airway dimensions and head posture in obstructive sleep apnea.Eur J Orthod1996. 18:571579.
  • 21
    van Lunteren, E.
    ,
    M. A.Haxhiu
    , and
    N. S.Cherniak
    . Relation between upper airway volume and hyoid muscle length.J Appl Physiol1987. 63:14431449.
  • 22
    Takagi, Y.
    ,
    J. W.Gamble
    ,
    W. R.Proffit
    , and
    R. L.Christensen
    . Postural change of the hyoid bone following osteotomy of the mandible.J Oral Surg1967. 23:688692.
  • 23
    Fromm, B.
    and
    M.Lundberg
    . Postural behavior of the hyoid bone in normal occlusion and before and after surgical correction of mandibular protrusion.Swed Dent J1970. 63:425433.
  • 24
    Opdebeeck, H.
    ,
    W. H.Bell
    ,
    J.Eisenfeld
    , and
    D.Mishelevich
    . Comparative study between the SFS and LFS rotation as a possible morphogenic mechanism.Am J Orthod1978. 74:509521.
  • 25
    Graber, L. W.
    Hyoid changes following orthopedic treatment of mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod 1978. 48:3338.
  • 26
    Adamitis, P. I.
    and
    N. M.Spyropoulos
    . The effects of lymphadenoid hypertrophy on the position of the tongue, the mandible and the hyoid bone.Eur J Orthod1983. 5:287294.
  • 27
    Winnberg, A.
    Suprahyoid biomechanics and head posture. An electromyographic, videoflurographic and dynamographic study of hyo-mandibular function in man. Swed Dent J Suppl 1987. 46:1173.
  • 28
    Winnberg, A.
    ,
    H.Pancherz
    , and
    P. L.Westesson
    . Head posture and hyomandibular function in man: a synchronized electromyographic and videofluorographic study of the open close-clench cycle.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1988. 94:393404.
  • 29
    Battagel, J. M.
    ,
    A.Johal
    ,
    P. R.L'Estrange
    ,
    C. B.Croft
    , and
    B.Kotecha
    . Changes in airway and hyoid position in response to mandibular protrusion in subjects with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).Eur J Orthod1999. 21:363375.
  • 30
    Adamidis, I. P.
    and
    M. N.Spyropoulos
    . Hyoid bone position and orientation in Class I and Class III malocclusions.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1992. 101:308312.
  • 31
    Archilleos, S.
    ,
    O.Krogstad
    , and
    T.Lyberg
    . Surgical mandibular advancement and changes in uvuloglossopharyngeal morphology and head posture: a short- and long-term cephalometric study in males.Eur J Orthod2000. 22:367381.
  • 32
    Archilleos, S.
    ,
    O.Krogstad
    , and
    T.Lyberg
    . Surgical mandibular setback and changes in uvuloglossopharyngeal morphology and head posture: a short- and long-term cephalometric study in males.Eur J Orthod2000. 22:383394.
  • 33
    Dahlberg, G.
    Statistical Methods for Medical and Biological Students. New York, NY: Interscience Publications; 1940.
  • 34
    Houston, W. J. B.
    The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 1983. 83:382390.
  • 35
    Jeans, W. D.
    ,
    D. C. J.Fernando
    ,
    A. R.Maw
    , and
    B. C.Leighton
    . A longitudinal study of the growth of the nasopharynx and its contents in normal children.Br J Radiol1981. 54:117121.
  • 36
    Handelman, C. S.
    and
    G.Osborne
    . Growth of the nasopharynx and adenoid development from one to eighteen years.Angle Orthod1976. 46:243259.
  • 37
    Tourné, L. P. M.
    Growth of the pharynx and its physiologic implications. Am J Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop 1991. 99:129139.
  • 38
    Hamdan, A. M.
    and
    W. P.Rock
    . Cephalometric norms in an Arabic population.J Orthod2001. 28:297300.
  • 39
    Oktay, H.
    A comparison of ANB, WITS, AF-BF, and APDI measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991. 99:122128.
  • 40
    Chang, H. P.
    Assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987. 92:117122.
  • 41
    Jacobson, A.
    The “Wits” appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod 1975. 67:125138.
  • 42
    Hussels, W.
    and
    R. S.Nanda
    . Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB.Am J Orthod1984. 85:411423.
  • 43
    Ishikawa, H.
    ,
    S.Nakamura
    ,
    H.Iwasaki
    , and
    S.Kitazawa
    . Seven parameters describing anteroposterior jaw relationship: postpubertal prediction accuracy and interchangeability.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2000. 117:714720.
  • 44
    Takahashi, S.
    ,
    T.Ono
    ,
    Y.Ishiwata
    , and
    T.Kuroda
    . Effect of changes in the breathing mode and body position of tongue pressure with respiratory-related oscillations.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1999. 115:239246.
  • 45
    Hellsing, E.
    Changes in the pharyngeal airway in relation to extension of the head. Eur J Orthod 1989. 11:359365.
  • 46
    Liistro, G.
    ,
    D.Stanescu
    ,
    G.Dooms
    ,
    D.Rodenstein
    , and
    C.Veriter
    . Head position modifies upper airway resistance in men.J Appl Physiol1988. 64:12851288.
  • 47
    Davies, R. J. O.
    and
    J. R.Stradling
    . The relationship between neck circumference, radiographic pharyngeal anatomy, and the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.Eur Respir J1990. 3:509514.
  • 48
    Guilleminault, C.
    ,
    R.Riley
    , and
    N.Powell
    . Obstructive sleep apnea and abnormal cephalometric measurements.Chest1984. 86:793794.
  • 49
    Emslie, R. D.
    ,
    M.Massler
    , and
    J. D.Zwemer
    . Mouth breathing: etiology and effects.J Am Dent Assoc1952. 44:506521.
  • 50
    Quick, C. A.
    and
    K. K.Gundlach
    . Adenoid facies.Laryngoscope1978. 88:327333.
  • 51
    Bibby, R. E.
    and
    C. B.Preston
    . The hyoid triangle.Am J Orthod. 1981;80:92–97.
  • 52
    Yamaoka, M.
    ,
    K.Furusawa
    ,
    T.Uematsu
    ,
    N.Okafuji
    ,
    D.Kayamoto
    , and
    S.Kurihara
    . Relationship of the hyoid bone and posterior surface of the tongue in prognathism and micrognathia.J Oral Rehabil2003. 30:914920.
  • 53
    Graber, T. M.
    and
    B.Neumann
    . Removable Orthodontic Appliances.Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1977:230.
  • 54
    Issa, F. G.
    ,
    P.Edwards
    ,
    E.Szeto
    ,
    D.Lauff
    , and
    C.Sullivan
    . Genioglossus and breathing responses to airway occlusion: effect of sleep and route of occlusion.J Appl Physiol1988. 64:543.
  • 55
    Pae, E-K.
    ,
    A. A.Lowe
    , and
    J. A.Fleetham
    . A role of pharyngeal length in obstructive sleep apnea patients.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1997. 111:1217.
  • 56
    Wenzel, A.
    ,
    S.Williams
    , and
    M.Ritzau
    . Relationships of changes in craniofacial morphology, head posture, and nasopharyngeal airway size following mandibular osteotomy.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1989. 96:138143.
  • 57
    Mergen, D. C.
    and
    R. M.Jacobs
    . The size of the nasopharynx associated with normal occlusion and Class II malocclusion.Angle Orthod1970. 40:342346.
Copyright: Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists
<bold>FIGURE 1.</bold>
FIGURE 1.

Cephalometric points, lines, and linear variables used in the cephalometric analysis. TT, tongue tip; Eb, base of epiglottis; P, tip of soft palate; PNS, posterior nasal spine; Me, menton; Go, gonion; B, point B; RGN, retrognathion; H, hyoidale; C3: Anteroinferior limit of third cervical vertebra. Mandibular plane: Go-Me, Go-B line. (1) TGL, tongue length (Eb-TT); (2) TGH, tongue height (maximum height of tongue along perpendicular line of Eb-TT line to tongue dorsum); (3) PNSP, soft palate length (PNS-P); (4) MPT, soft palate thickness (maximum thickness of soft palate measured on line perpendicular to PNS-P line); (5) SPAS, superior posterior airway space (width of airway behind soft palate along parallel line to Go-B line); (6) MAS, middle airway space (width of airway along parallel line to Go-B line through P); (7) IAS, inferior airway space (width of airway space along Go-B line); (8) VAL, vertical airway length (distance between PNS and Eb); (9) MPH, perpendicular distance from hyoid bone to mandibular plane; (10) HH1, perpendicular distance from hyoid bone to the line connecting C3 and RGN; (11) HRGN, distance between hyoid bone and RGN; (12) C3H, distance between hyoid bone and C3


Contributor Notes

Corresponding author: Elham S. J. Abu Alhaija, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, PO Box 3030, Irbid, Jordan (elham@just.edu.jo)

Accepted: 01 Jan 2005
  • Download PDF